Crayon
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
- The Analyze tab lists two AI features
- Three customer cards open with a figure
- The pricing page is a ten-field estimate form
Product teardown
By coExploro · Captured
Reviewed and edited by coExploro · Independent, not affiliated · Public methodology · Corrections: support@coexploro.com
How this page was made: Drafted by four AI analysts from a capture of crayon.co on . Checked by coExploro’s founder on .
A curated sample showing what coExploro observes about public homepages, pricing pages, feature pages, and UX signals.
Illustrative public sample. coExploro is not affiliated with Crayon.
Sample output
Overall score 85/100
PM 92
UX 79
Summary Card + findings
Summary Card
This public version uses the same compact card pattern as private teardowns: one score, four persona signals, and the strongest findings compressed into a card a product team can forward.
Read the methodologyOverall score
85/100
Confidence
mid
PM
92/100
UX
79/100
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
Findings
PM
High impact
A four-tab feature block further down the homepage reads 'Analyze', 'Enable', 'Compete' and 'Measure'. The highlighted 'Analyze' tab lists 'Intel in your inbox', 'AI news summarization' and 'AI importance scoring', the last described as 'sorting insights from high to low importance'.
Evidence: AI news summarization
· Seen on www.crayon.co, four-tab feature block, 'Analyze' tab, second item · Captured · Indirect evidence
Marketing
High impact
The three cards below the logo row open with '40%', '$6 Million' and '22%' in large type, followed by 'increase in battlecard adoption', 'in influenced revenue achieved in less than a year' and 'increase in competitive win rate'. Each card names a person and job title at Alteryx, Cognism or Salsify and links to 'READ CASE STUDY'.
Evidence: increase in battlecard adoption
· Seen on www.crayon.co, customer cards below the logo row, first card, under the figure · Captured · Indirect evidence
UX
High impact
The pricing page shows a 'Request an Estimate' form and no plan or price. All ten field labels end in an asterisk, from 'First Name*' to 'Message*', and '# Employees*' is a drop-down reading '- Please Select -'. The button below reads 'Send Inquiry'.
Evidence: Request an Estimate
· Seen on www.crayon.co/pricing, pricing page, heading of the form · Captured · Indirect evidence
Design
Medium impact
The homepage shows customer quotes as three cards that each open with a figure, then as one Allego quote beside an orange graphic, then as a carousel with an arrow on each side and five dots below. Each layout pairs the quote with a name and job title.
Evidence: See How Top B2B Teams are using Crayon to Win
· Seen on www.crayon.co, heading of the customer-quote carousel, below the purple demo block · Captured · Indirect evidence
FAQ
This sample covers pages that were publicly visible on . No account, private data or share link is involved. It carries observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
UX returned 79 while PM, Marketing and Design returned 92, 87 and 80. The one UX finding published here is the pricing page's estimate form, and it does not explain the gap on its own.
First and last name, business email, phone number, company name, company website, job title, number of employees, 'How did you hear about us?' and a message, under the prompt 'Please tell us a bit about what you're looking to accomplish'. Each label ends in an asterisk, and the button reads 'Send Inquiry'.
'Crayon AI mines intel from your data, creates instant content, and enables your reps with talk tracks and sales plays that actually help them close more deals.' The hero image beside it shows an 'Ask Crayon AI' button next to a sample question.
'4.6 Stars on G2', beside the G2 logo and a row of five stars, in a pill above the hero headline 'Drive More Competitive Wins with Automated Insights'.
Next