coExploro

Methodology

How coExploro turns a URL into a product teardown

See the capture, extraction, persona review, UX scoring, and synthesis steps behind the public Linear sample.

What this page covers

Method
5-step pipeline
Inputs
Screenshots and facts
Output
Summary Card plus findings

Pipeline

The teardown pipeline

Each stage has one job: capture evidence, structure it, evaluate it, score it, then synthesize the product readout.

01

Capture the public product experience

coExploro captures visible product pages and screenshots so each observation starts from product evidence.

Grounds the teardown in what a buyer or evaluator can actually see.

02

Extract observable facts

The first model pass describes page types, components, pricing cues, onboarding signals, and other visible details.

Keeps evaluation separate from fact collection.

03

Evaluate with four product personas

PM, Marketing, UX, and Design personas review the same extracted facts from their own decision lens.

Turns one product capture into multiple useful perspectives.

04

Score UX signals

The UX score summarizes dimension-level signals. It sits beside the primary product synthesis score.

Helps teams scan friction and polish without treating the number as absolute truth.

05

Synthesize the readout

The synthesis layer turns persona findings into a Summary Card, recommendation list, and generated app views.

Creates an artifact a product team can inspect, forward, or revisit.

Output

How process maps to output

The public Linear sample shows the Summary Card and findings. Generated private teardowns can include additional app views.

Screenshots

Evidence for what was visible in the captured product experience.

Extraction

Page types, components, pricing cues, onboarding signals, and other observable facts.

Persona evaluation

PM, Marketing, UX, and Design recommendations over the same facts.

Synthesis

Summary Card, findings, and generated teardown views for the private app experience.

Inspect the public Linear sample

Trust

Trust boundaries

The methodology is useful because it is explicit about what the system can and cannot see.

coExploro analyzes what can be captured from the product experience.

It does not replace customer interviews, analytics, or usability testing.

It can miss gated states, account-specific flows, or content hidden behind access controls.

Scores are decision support, not absolute truth.

Public sample pages are curated and separate from private share links.

FAQ

Methodology notes

A few answers that help keep the output useful without overclaiming what the analysis can prove.

Is this raw AI output?

No. Public samples are curated for clarity. Generated teardowns still come from the same capture, extraction, persona, and synthesis pipeline.

Does coExploro replace user research?

No. It helps a team quickly understand a product experience, then decide where deeper research or customer evidence is needed.

What does the UX score measure?

The UX score summarizes seven observable dimensions: visual hierarchy, navigation clarity, content quality, CTA effectiveness, trust signals, mobile responsiveness, and perceived performance.

Why do personas review the same product?

A PM, marketer, UX reviewer, and designer notice different risks. Reviewing the same facts keeps those perspectives comparable.

Are public samples connected to private share links?

No. Public samples use curated static routes. Private share links stay tokenized and out of the public sitemap.

See the method on a real sample.

Start with Linear, then run the same format on a product you care about.