coExploro
Teardowns

Product teardown

n8n product teardown

By coExploro · Captured

A curated sample showing what coExploro observes about public homepages, pricing pages, feature pages, and UX signals.

Illustrative public sample. coExploro is not affiliated with n8n.

Sample output

Overall score 84/100

PM 88

UX 78

Summary Card + findings

Category
Workflow automation
Captured
Published
Updated
Visit product

Summary Card

The shareable readout before the full canvas.

This public version uses the same compact card pattern as private teardowns: one score, four persona signals, and the strongest findings compressed into a card a product team can forward.

Read the methodology

Overall score

84/100

Confidence

mid

PM

88/100

UX

78/100

coExploro

n8n

teardown · captured 2026-08-10

Overall score · good
84
mid confidence
PM
88
MKT
86
UX
78
DSG
83

Top findings

  • Pro to Business is a sixteen-fold price step
  • Security and billing sit inside the FAQ
  • Four tiers share the comparison grid
coexploro.com/teardowns/n8nView full teardown

Findings

What the personas surfaced.

PM

High impact

Pro to Business is a sixteen-fold price step

The pricing page lists Pro at $50 per month and Business at $800 per month, with no tier priced between the two.

mid confidence

Marketing

Medium impact

Security and billing sit inside the FAQ

The pricing FAQ runs to twenty-two questions, and security and billing are among the topics answered inside that list.

mid confidence

UX

High impact

Four tiers share the comparison grid

The comparison grid contains four tiers: Starter, Pro, Business and Enterprise.

mid confidence

Design

High impact

Twenty-two questions run as one list

The FAQ section holds twenty-two questions in a single list, with no sub-grouping between them.

mid confidence

FAQ

Public sample notes.

Is this a live n8n account scan?

No. It covers three pages that were publicly visible on 10 August 2026. No account, private data or share link is involved.

Why is the UX persona lower than the others?

UX scored 78 against 88 for PM, 86 for Marketing and 83 for Design. The one finding published for it is the four-tier comparison grid; the other personas scored the pricing structure and the FAQ higher.

Why are there no recommendations here?

These pages carry observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.

Next

Run the same format on a product you care about.

Start a teardown