coExploro
Teardowns

Product teardown

Figma product teardown

By coExploro · Captured

A curated sample showing what coExploro observes about public homepages, pricing pages, feature pages, and UX signals.

Illustrative public sample. coExploro is not affiliated with Figma.

Sample output

Overall score 85/100

PM 92

UX 82

Summary Card + findings

Category
Product design tools
Captured
Published
Updated
Visit product

Summary Card

The shareable readout before the full canvas.

This public version uses the same compact card pattern as private teardowns: one score, four persona signals, and the strongest findings compressed into a card a product team can forward.

Read the methodology

Overall score

85/100

Confidence

mid

PM

92/100

UX

82/100

coExploro

Figma

teardown · captured 2026-08-10

Overall score · good
85
mid confidence
PM
92
MKT
77
UX
82
DSG
87

Top findings

  • Nine product icons sit under one brand
  • The hero opens with plan and seat selection
  • The comparison grid carries four tiers
coexploro.com/teardowns/figmaView full teardown

Findings

What the personas surfaced.

PM

High impact

Nine product icons sit under one brand

The captured page shows nine distinct product icons, among them 'Dev Mode', 'Slides' and 'Motion'.

mid confidence

Marketing

High impact

The hero opens with plan and seat selection

The hero line reads 'Pick your plan, choose your seats'; the copy names plan and seat selection.

mid confidence

UX

High impact

The comparison grid carries four tiers

The comparison grid presents four tiers: Starter, Professional, Organization and Enterprise.

mid confidence

Design

High impact

Hero and pricing table share primary prominence

Both the hero and the main pricing table sit at primary prominence, positioned above the fold.

mid confidence

FAQ

Public sample notes.

Is this a live Figma account scan?

No. It covers three pages that were publicly visible on 10 August 2026. No account, private data or share link is involved.

Why is the Marketing persona lower than the others?

Marketing scored 77 against 92 for PM, 87 for Design and 82 for UX. The one finding published for it is the hero wording, 'Pick your plan, choose your seats'; the other personas scored the product line-up and the pricing layout higher.

Why are there no recommendations here?

These pages carry observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.

Next

Run the same format on a product you care about.

Start a teardown