Figma
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
- Nine product icons sit under one brand
- The hero opens with plan and seat selection
- The comparison grid carries four tiers
Product teardown
By coExploro · Captured
A curated sample showing what coExploro observes about public homepages, pricing pages, feature pages, and UX signals.
Illustrative public sample. coExploro is not affiliated with Figma.
Sample output
Overall score 85/100
PM 92
UX 82
Summary Card + findings
Summary Card
This public version uses the same compact card pattern as private teardowns: one score, four persona signals, and the strongest findings compressed into a card a product team can forward.
Read the methodologyOverall score
85/100
Confidence
mid
PM
92/100
UX
82/100
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
Findings
PM
High impact
The captured page shows nine distinct product icons, among them 'Dev Mode', 'Slides' and 'Motion'.
mid confidence
Marketing
High impact
The hero line reads 'Pick your plan, choose your seats'; the copy names plan and seat selection.
mid confidence
UX
High impact
The comparison grid presents four tiers: Starter, Professional, Organization and Enterprise.
mid confidence
Design
High impact
Both the hero and the main pricing table sit at primary prominence, positioned above the fold.
mid confidence
FAQ
No. It covers three pages that were publicly visible on 10 August 2026. No account, private data or share link is involved.
Marketing scored 77 against 92 for PM, 87 for Design and 82 for UX. The one finding published for it is the hero wording, 'Pick your plan, choose your seats'; the other personas scored the product line-up and the pricing layout higher.
These pages carry observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
Next