Captured from figma.com on · Reviewed and edited by coExploro · Not affiliated with Figma
By coExploro · Captured · Updated
Published · Category: Product design tools
Reviewed and edited by coExploro · Independent, not affiliated · Public methodology · Corrections: support@coexploro.com
How this page was made: Drafted by four AI analysts from a capture of figma.com on . Checked by coExploro’s founder on .
Visit figma.com (opens in a new tab)PM · High impact · Indirect evidence
Marketing · High impact · Direct evidence
UX · Medium impact · Page context
Paste its address. Four AI analysts read its public pages in 2–4 minutes.
PM · High impact · Indirect evidence
Under the headline, a grey panel lists ten products, each with its own icon: Figma Design, Figma Make, Figma Draw, Dev Mode, FigJam, Figma Slides, Figma Motion, Figma Specs, Figma Sites and Figma Buzz.
Evidence: Figma Specs
· Seen on www.figma.com/pricing/, pricing page hero, product list under the headline, second row · Captured · Indirect evidence
Marketing · High impact · Direct evidence
The headline reads 'Pick your plan, choose your seats'. The plan grid follows the product list below it, and each paid plan lists a 'Dev seat' and a 'Collab seat' with a monthly price.
Evidence: Pick your plan, choose your seats
· Seen on www.figma.com/pricing/, pricing page hero headline · Captured · Direct evidence
UX · Medium impact · Page context
Under 'Compare all features', the grid sets Starter, Professional, Organization and Enterprise as four columns. The 'Figma Design' section is open with nineteen rows, and fourteen more sections, from 'Figma Make' to 'Security', are collapsed.
Evidence: Compare all features
· Seen on www.figma.com/pricing/, pricing page, heading of the comparison grid below the add-ons · Captured · Page context
Design · High impact
The plan grid starts directly under the hero, with Starter, Professional, Organization and Enterprise named in one row. The add-ons, the 'Compare all features' grid and the FAQ all come after it.
No evidence attached
UX score 90 (good), medium confidence
5 of 6 dimensions observed
Read from the capture. It is a different number from the scores on the Summary Card below: the Overall score, 69, is the analysts’ consensus, and 67 is the UX analyst’s own score.
The Overall score, four analysts’ scores and three findings, on one card a team can forward.
Read the methodologyteardown · captured 2026-10-29
Top findings
This sample covers pages that were publicly visible on . No account, private data or share link is involved. It carries observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
Marketing returned 62 against 74 for Design, 72 for PM and 67 for UX. The one Marketing finding published here is the plan-and-seat headline, and it does not explain the gap on its own.
'What is a seat?', 'Where can I see a breakdown of my billing?', 'What happens if I add seats mid-year on an annual plan?' and 'Can I purchase products individually?' The list holds ten questions.
The pricing FAQ says Full seats include 3,000 credits a month on Professional, 3,500 on Organization and 4,250 on Enterprise. It adds that every other seat, Collab, Dev and View, and every user on the Starter plan receives five hundred credits a month.