Zoom
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
- Mail and Calendar are listed in the paid tiers
- The header carries both sales and self-serve entry
- The comparison grid runs from Recording to Workflow Automation
Product teardown
By coExploro · Captured
A curated sample showing what coExploro observes about public homepages, pricing pages, feature pages, and UX signals.
Illustrative public sample. coExploro is not affiliated with Zoom.
Sample output
Overall score 86/100
PM 88
UX 82
Summary Card + findings
Summary Card
This public version uses the same compact card pattern as private teardowns: one score, four persona signals, and the strongest findings compressed into a card a product team can forward.
Read the methodologyOverall score
86/100
Confidence
mid
PM
88/100
UX
82/100
teardown · captured 2026-08-10
Top findings
Findings
PM
High impact
The Pro and Business tiers, listed between $14.16 and $18.33, list Mail and Calendar alongside meetings in the same plan rows.
mid confidence
Marketing
High impact
Contact Sales and Sign Up Free sit next to each other in the navigation bar.
mid confidence
UX
High impact
The plan comparison grid lists rows including Recording, AI Features and Workflow Automation.
mid confidence
Design
High impact
The primary navigation carries its text links in one bar with its action buttons.
mid confidence
FAQ
No. It covers three pages that were publicly visible on 10 August 2026. No account, private data or share link is involved.
UX returned 82 and Design 83, against 92 for Marketing and 88 for PM. UX read the comparison grid and Design read the header, while Marketing read the two entry points.
These pages carry observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
Next