Paste its address. Four AI analysts read its public pages in 2–4 minutes.
Try an example:
All 4 findings
The hero frames Zapier as automation for the agentic era
PM · High impact · Direct evidence
The homepage headline reads 'Welcome to automation in the agentic era'. The line under it tells visitors to start building in their favorite AI tool, 'then run and govern trusted workflows on Zapier.'
Evidence:Welcome to automation in the agentic era · Seen on zapier.com, homepage hero headline · Captured · Direct evidence
Plan selection starts with a task-volume slider
Marketing · High impact · Direct evidence
With the 'Platform' tab selected, the pricing page first asks 'How many tasks do you need?' above a slider marked from '100' to '2M'. The 'Pay monthly' and 'Pay yearly (Save 33%)' choice and the four plan cards with their prices come after it.
Evidence:How many tasks do you need? · Seen on zapier.com/pricing, pricing page, above the billing choice and the plan cards · Captured · Direct evidence
The pricing FAQ groups 31 questions under seven headings
UX · Low impact · Indirect evidence
Under 'Frequently asked questions', the headings run 'Zapier overview', 'Tables', 'Forms', 'MCP', 'SDK', 'Plans and payment' and 'Sales and support'. 'Zapier overview' holds eleven of the 31 questions.
Evidence:Plans and payment · Seen on zapier.com/pricing, pricing FAQ, sixth group heading · Captured · Indirect evidence
Professional shows cents and Team whole dollars
Design · Low impact · Page context
With 'Pay yearly (Save 33%)' selected, Professional reads 'Starting from' '$19.99 /month' and Team 'Starting from' '$69 /month'. Free reads '$0 /month', and Enterprise 'Contact for pricing'.
Evidence:Contact for pricing · Seen on zapier.com/pricing, pricing page plan cards, Enterprise card · Captured · Page context
UX score by dimension
UX score 90 (good), medium confidence
5 of 6 dimensions observed
Read from the capture. It is a different number from the scores on the Summary Card below: the Overall score, 70, is the analysts’ consensus, and 62 is the UX analyst’s own score.
Visual hierarchy92 Good
Navigation clarity95 Good
Content quality88 Good
CTA effectiveness90 Good
Trust signals85 Good
Performance perceptionNot observed
The Summary Card
The Overall score, four analysts’ scores and three findings, on one card a team can forward.
The hero frames Zapier as automation for the agentic era
Plan selection starts with a task-volume slider
The pricing FAQ groups 31 questions under seven headings
coexploro.com/teardowns/zapierView full teardown
Public sample notes.
This sample covers pages that were publicly visible on . No account, private data or share link is involved. It carries observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
Why did the UX persona score Zapier lower than the other three?
UX returned 62 against 75 for PM, 73 for Design and 70 for Marketing. The one UX finding published here is the grouped pricing FAQ, and it does not explain the gap on its own.
What happens when a Zapier plan reaches its task limit?
The block 'Your plan, your way' on the pricing page says a plan that reaches its limit is 'switched to pay-as-you-go' unless the customer turns that off or moves up to a higher tier. The Free card lists one hundred tasks a month.
What does Zapier's features page offer?
The page opens with 'Next Gen Zaps' and an 'EARLY ACCESS' tag, and offers three buttons: 'Try classic Zaps', 'Get early access to Next Gen Zaps' and 'Talk to Sales'. Its line under the headline says Zapier turns a workflow built in chat 'into predictable automation'.
Run the same teardown on a product you care about.