Paste its address. Four AI analysts read its public pages in 2–4 minutes.
Try an example:
All 4 findings
The pricing FAQ covers buying through Atlassian.com
PM · Medium impact · Direct evidence
The pricing FAQ below the plan cards and the feature table lists ten questions. The second is 'What's the difference between buying Loom on Loom.com versus Atlassian.com?', and the header logo reads 'ATLASSIAN' above 'Loom'.
Evidence:What's the difference between buying Loom on Loom.com versus Atlassian.com? · Seen on loom.com/pricing, pricing FAQ below the plan cards, second question · Captured · Direct evidence
The section after the logos introduces Record for agent
Marketing · Medium impact · Direct evidence
Below the customer logos, a block marked 'New!' is headed 'Show it in Loom, ship with any agent'. It says 'Record for agent' packages screen, clicks and URLs 'into a rich prompt, ready for any agent to run', and it names 'new MCP tools' that bring the prompt and the Loom library into other AI tools.
Evidence:Show it in Loom, ship with any agent · Seen on loom.com, homepage, blue 'New!' block below the customer logos, headline · Captured · Direct evidence
The hero pairs 'Get Loom for free' with a Chrome extension install
UX · High impact · Direct evidence
Under 'One video is worth a thousand words', the hero places 'Get Loom for free' beside 'Install Chrome Extension'. A video preview marked '1 min' sits below the two buttons.
Evidence:Install Chrome Extension · Seen on loom.com, homepage hero, second button · Captured · Direct evidence
Starter shows '$0' with no unit beside it
Design · Medium impact · Indirect evidence
With 'Monthly' selected under 'Bill me:', Business reads '$18 per user / month' and Business + AI '$24 per user / month'. Starter reads '$0' alone, and Enterprise reads 'Let’s Talk'.
Evidence:per user / month · Seen on loom.com/pricing, pricing page plan grid, beside the Business and Business + AI prices · Captured · Indirect evidence
UX score by dimension
UX score 92 (good), medium confidence
5 of 6 dimensions observed
Read from the capture. It is a different number from the scores on the Summary Card below: the Overall score, 74, is the analysts’ consensus, and 70 is the UX analyst’s own score.
Visual hierarchy92 Good
Navigation clarity88 Good
Content quality90 Good
CTA effectiveness94 Good
Trust signals95 Good
Performance perceptionNot observed
The Summary Card
The Overall score, four analysts’ scores and three findings, on one card a team can forward.
The pricing FAQ covers buying through Atlassian.com
The section after the logos introduces Record for agent
The hero pairs 'Get Loom for free' with a Chrome extension install
coexploro.com/teardowns/loomView full teardown
Public sample notes.
This sample covers pages that were publicly visible on . No account, private data or share link is involved. It carries observations only. The underlying run does produce recommendations, but they are written for someone deciding how to compete with the product, which is not what a public page about that product should say.
Why did the Design persona score Loom higher than the other three?
Design returned 82 against 74 for PM, 71 for Marketing and 70 for UX. The one Design finding published here is Starter's '$0' shown without a unit, and it does not explain the gap on its own.
What does Loom's pricing FAQ open with?
'Can I start a free trial of paid plans?', then 'What's the difference between buying Loom on Loom.com versus Atlassian.com?' and 'Why should I consider getting Loom Business + AI?' The list holds ten questions.
Which security controls does Loom's homepage name?
SSO, SCIM, custom data retention policies and privacy settings, in the section headed 'Keep your content safe'.
Run the same teardown on a product you care about.